Search Results
8743 items found for ""
Other Pages (2830)
- Latest Film Reviews | UK Film Review
Latest Film Reviews The latest movie reviews from UK film critics, this is the page to find the newest reviews from our team. The UK Film Review critics are assembled from around the globe, covering all types of movies. Whether these are movie reviews for films currently in UK cinemas (or even globally) or for films on streaming sites such as Netflix, Prime Video or Disney Plus, we cover them all. On this page you will also find the latest film reviews for indie and short films from the UK and around the world. Every month, UK Film Review receives a large selection of submissions from filmmakers requesting us to watch their independently made film and review it. We treat all movies the same and our reviews are never (ever) paid for! We do receive payment from PR companies and other filmmakers for services such as promoting their film, or skipping to queue, but this has nothing to do with the movie review itself. Whilst you will see our latest movie reviews here you should also follow UK Film Review on our social media profiles, as well as subscribe to our popular film podcast. This will help you stay up-to-date with the latest releases, as well as the goings-on from our community of film lovers and critics. average rating is 3 out of 5 Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Nocturnes Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Chasing Euphoria Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Ronnie California: The King of Artesia Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 What I Think Of You Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Close Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Numbered Lives Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The End Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 September 5 Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Scrap Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Rhino Man Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Kraven the Hunter Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Oh, Canada Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Largo Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Queer Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 The Castle of Baron Finch Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 I Could Dom Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The Man in the White Van Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Nosferatu Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 The 21 Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Motel Room Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The Emerald Wasp Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Weightless Words Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Blurred Lines (2024) Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Nightbitch Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Flow Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Werewolves Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 I'll Be Frank Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Get Away Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 The Last Ranger Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Y2K Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Peace Process Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Bull Street Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 That Christmas Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Perform Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Lots Love Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Walnuts Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Til Your Last Breath Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Maria Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Freelance Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Farewell Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Lovesick Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Conclave Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Nutcrackers Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Lola Dust Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Opportunity Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 The Other Birthday Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Moana 2 Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Beatles '64 Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Cubic Zirconia Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Molina Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Mouse Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Moeder Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Happy Pals Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 To Hell With You Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Petro Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The American Question Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Rita Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Buscando Alma Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The Miner's Son Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Gladiator II Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Kruste Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Wicked Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Flirting with Darkness Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 A Place to Fall Down Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 My Week with Maisy Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Street Trash Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 From Above Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Meal Ticket Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Neither Donkey Nor Horse Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Picture Day Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Seven Jewish Children Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Tomorrow Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Pylon Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Red One Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 A Real Pain Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Unspoken by LT Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Pocket Princess Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Orango Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 A Beautiful Day Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Sileo Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Death Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Into the Unknown Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 That's the Spirit Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Art Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 My Name Is Alfred Hitchcock Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Memoir of a Snail Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Belief Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Breakdown Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Miss or Misses Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Another World Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Through the Stew Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Here Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Signs of Allegiance Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Absolution Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Anora Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Emilia Pérez Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Chasing Chasing Amy Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Continuance Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 In the Garden of Tulips Read Review
- Film Reviews | UK Film Review
Film Reviews Here at UK Film Review we like to tackle all kinds film reviews. Our writers come from all walks of life, and feel passionate about critiquing the movies they watch. From the latest Theatrical Releases to Short Films, Indie Films, Documentaries and even Animation, the contributors of UK Film Review are as eager to please as Dev Patel in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (2011). If you are a filmmaker, or are working in film PR and want to promote one of your clients, please get in touch using the Submit Your Film button under the drop-down menu for Home. Take a look at our list of film reviews below from some of the hottest releases in UK cinemas. Simply click the image of the review you would like, or the title of the movie. Or use the search button to find the movie you are looking for. We have given any feature length film a star rating (out of 5) in order to help viewers sort the Citizen Kanes from the Waterworlds, the Inceptions from the Transformers. Michael Bay will be given a fair film review from our writers, but that probably will not go in his favour. Speaking of Filmmakers, head over to our Filmmaker Features page for awesome articles about some of the best filmmaking geniuses who ever lived. Movie Trailers are also available, either underneath the film reviews, or on the Movie Trailers page. And lastly, if you like your film reviews verbalised. Simply because reading is boring and listening is marvellous, then make sure you Subscribe to the UK Film Review Podcast. Our critics offer up some banterous opinions on the best and worst movies across all genres. Head over to the Podcast page, or click this link to go straight to iTunes. If you would like to read or view any of the following, simply use the navigation. Alternatively, you can click on one of the images to read the film reviews here, or simply have a ganders at the lovely movie artwork on display. Remember to listen to film reviews on our regular film podcast. GET REVIEWED average rating is 3 out of 5 Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Nocturnes Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Ronnie California: The King of Artesia Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 What I Think Of You Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 The End Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 September 5 Read Review average rating is 4 out of 5 Scrap Read Review average rating is 2 out of 5 Kraven the Hunter Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Oh, Canada Read Review average rating is 5 out of 5 Largo Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 Queer Read Review average rating is 3 out of 5 I Could Dom Read Review Chris Olson Mar 8 2 min read Film Podcast - Dune: Part 2 Chris Olson Mar 1 3 min read Film Podcast: George Clooney Rowing Biopic Scoops Film of the Month - Jan 20, 2023 3 min read TAR FILM REVIEW Taryll Baker Oct 13, 2022 2 min read Empire of Light - Film Review - Oct 11, 2022 3 min read Bones and All LFF Review - Oct 7, 2022 3 min read White Noise (2022) LFF Review - Sep 20, 2022 2 min read Sanctuary TIFF Review UK Film Review Sep 13, 2022 5 min read FrightFest 2022 Highlights - May 25, 2022 3 min read Top Gun: Maverick Film Review - Apr 23, 2022 3 min read The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent Film Review Spoilers in our film reviews As with all digital forms of expression sometimes people may find something that upsets them online. Spoilers can often be one of these things! Whilst we do our best to ensure that major plot points, twists, character deaths and celebrity cameos are not found in our reviews, it can sometimes be difficult to judge what each and every film lover on the planet would to be a spoiler. If you feel that one of our film reviews contains one too many details then please do let us (politely) know using our social media platforms. We may then take serious action, such as expelling the critic responsible from this and every other movie publication past and present, declaring war against the studio for leading our writer into temptation, or we may do nothing at all. To be honest, it is most likely going to be the latter unless some serious rules have been broken. You may also see some movie trailers in our reviews that could also contain potential spoilers. In which case anyone who is hoping to avoid these should probably not click the play button on them. Or click the play button, turn the sound down on your device, then leave the room for a least 28 minutes whilst the trailer finishes and leaves your life naturally. You may be wondering what you could do with all 28 of those minutes! Why not read some more film reviews on another device? Or make a short film of your cat playing with a piece of string? Spend it wisely guys and gals.
- Latest Short Film Reviews | UK Film Review
Latest Short Film Reviews On this page you will find the most recent short film reviews written by the UK Film Review critic. If you are looking for a particular short film review, you can use the search function at the top of the website. The vast majority of short film reviews we write are for films that have been submitted to us by independent filmmakers themselves. So if you have a short film you would like UK Film Review to review, visit the Submit Your Film page. Chasing Euphoria A short psychological thriller written and directed by Shayaan and starring Aryan Sadaat, Riccardo Habet and Bakh Syeda. Two young best friends (Sadaat and Habet) are spending a night out in the city. Then one of them spots a girl (Syeda) sitting by herself and he decides to approach her. She rejects him, however she is keen on his friend and the two of them begin dating, much to the other guy's annoyance. As the two of them continue to blossom their relationship, the rejected begins spying on them and his aggressive and disturbing behaviour spirals out of control. This short has an intriguing plot, beginning as a drama about relationships before turning into a thriller about stalking. As Sadaat's character becomes more and more obsessed with the couple, the bond he has with his friend is gradually destroyed as he clearly envies his ability to get along with girls and they turn against each other, arguing fiercely. The character development involving Sadaat's character is the heart of the film as the screenplay follows him as he falls into a personal abyss, drinking heavily, isolating himself and being consumed by anger and jealousy. The tension and drama rapidly build up as he targets the couple. It is also worth mentioning that there is a reference to one of the director's previous films. As vivid as the tension and drama are, the ending feels disappointing and that would be because it does not directly explain what actually happened. If it was intentional to have a story that ends with question marks and leaving the viewer to guess the events that took place then that was probably a mistake as a more obvious conclusion would had made the film's messages more evident. Also, regarding aspects that could had been improved, there is a fast cutting that shows what appears to be sparkles. Evidently, this was intended to help reveal the character's troubled state of mind. It is an interesting effect but maybe unnecessary. As Sadaat portrays the character whose actions are the main focus of the plot, his performance is vital for the film to have an effect and Sadaat pulls it off terrifically. Basically, his character is a youth whose personality changes throughout the story, turning from a simple guy into an angry fiend with sinister intentions who becomes obsessed with the relationship between his friend and the girl and is broken because he is unable to have a romantic relationship. Habet's character goes through good and bad experiences as he finds happiness with romance yet has to deal with his friends abusive and self-destrutive actions. Psychological deterioration, self-destruction, stalking, obsession and jealousy are major themes in this story and they are explored through Sadaat's character and so is the idea of being unable to find romance. More cheerfully, this story involves friendship and the joys of romantic relationships. This is a film anout a person who struggles to deal with their personal issues and ends up being a danger to themself and others. The intriguing plot, the tension, the drama and the strong performances add value, however some viewers might be unhappy with the unclear ending. VIEW REVIEW Ronnie California: The King of Artesia The self-contradicting facets of the immigrant experience are brilliantly dissected by Adi Kalidindi in Ronnie California: The King of Artesia, an imaginative and fun short film featuring an Indian man living in 90s America who tries to fit in in with his new country by taking up a classic pastime – organising an illegal gambling ring. The titular Ronnie California (Anand Mahalingam), following successful application for a name-change, looks to cement his place in America by running an illegal gambling ring out the back of his failing Saree shop. With interest on the rise, he becomes more and more extravagant with his dealings, and takes on the persona of a shady 70s car salesman. But his recklessness isolates his friends, who sense the law closing in. With impressive production, a canny and critical eye and plenty of laughs, Ronnie California is an accomplished and enjoyable short. It examines the immigrant experience using its title character, who wants nothing more than to fit in. And make lots of money. The use of ‘Ronnie’ to draw attention to discrimination and othering that Indians face in the United States is at the heart of the film. But where it shines comedically is in its devotion in never white-washing Ronnie’s shady qualities as a person. It’s hard to tell where his desire for acceptance ends and his willingness to bend the law for his own aims begins. There is a sympathy for the character in the film, but his sliminess and disregard for friends like Sidd (Nirvan Patnaik) adds real layers. Ronnie’s slow breakdown culminates in the law closing in and a moral choice which is one of the film’s most chaotic, dramatic and funny moments. The build-up of the character and his place in the ‘American Dream’ consistently balances drama and comedy, ensuring to highlight the faceless bureaucracy that crushes everyday Americans under its feet as a force that breaks down communities as well. Anand Mahalingham shines in the lead role. His performance as Ronnie – a man desperately trying to embody a mobster persona, is tragically hilarious. His Indian roots are never that far from the surface, and become more and more prominent as he gets more and more desperate. Nirvan Patnaik’s Sidd is more of a moral centre in the film – his quote about being a servant in both societies cuts deep to the core of Ronnie’s futile scheme. There’s a ton of depth to Ronnie California, beyond some great laughs and performances. The deconstruction of societal pressure on immigrants and what we expect for them to fit in is quietly profound throughout the short plot – not least in the tragi-comic choice the protagonist makes for his new name. Ronnie California might not be authentic, but his story definitely is. VIEW REVIEW What I Think Of You Two old friends meet up again to go for a wee walk in the woods, but a lot of retrodden ground needs to be covered when one of them can’t move on from the past. Steven (Watson) and Nick (Cumming) haven’t seen each other for a while. They used to hang out together but they don’t anymore and Nick has recently been in touch to see if he can remedy the situation. The two old pals have decided to go for a wee hike in the woods and hills around the city, with the green trees, rolling fields and tumbling water providing the perfect backdrop for a little reminiscing. The best buds are happily enjoying each other’s company, finding out about each other’s lives again, but as soon as the subject of current relationships is brought up the air turns a little funny and Nick finds himself not able to say very much. It seems that there is a bigger past at play which may not have run its course and this walk in the woods may just be a pretence for an unfinished conversation which needs to be had. Directed very ably by Max Hanover, What I Think Of You is really the baby of producer, writer and star, James Cumming. Taking on the role of Nick, Cumming bravely plays the more unsympathetic character of the piece, showing that he is more concerned about getting things right for his film than he is about looking good on camera. His script is relatable and genuine, with the two main characters feeling very ‘normal’ in their everyday language and issues. Both Jack Watson as Steven and James Cumming as Nick keep the feeling of the conversation very natural with their portrayal of the troubled friends, and the straightforward way the narrative plays out is helped by their believable everyday delivery. Cumming is also helped out in all corners by some crisp, luxuriant cinematography from Alex Roberts, a gentle, enigmatic score from Lizzie Mikietyn, and some great quality audio recorded by Paul Travers. All of these elements are very well handled and add immeasurably to the audience’s enjoyment of the film, allowing Cumming to air his themes through the dialogue as he touches on some pretty deep-seated issues. What I Think Of You seems very personal to James Cumming. He completely understands the themes he is trying to portray and writes his characters as though he knows them intimately. This all helps to keep the story and scenario of the film believable and relatable. What I Think Of You is, however, restricted by its focus and its narrative, with nothing more dramatic than a heated conversation happening during its entirety. There is plenty to like in the fifteen-minute runtime of What I Think Of You and what was expressed here, by cast and crew, is hopefully just a taster of what’s to come further down the line. VIEW REVIEW Close What makes a relationship a close one? Is is the quantity of time spent in another’s company or the quality of that time? How quickly can you form a close relationship? In minutes or does it take hours and days? Those are the questions ‘Close’ raises, though it doesn’t necessarily explore them to a satisfactory level of nuance and depth. ‘Close’ begins with an extract from a poem by Ferdinand Freiligrath - “O love, as long as you can love! O dear, as long as you love! The hour is coming, the hour is coming; Where you stand at graves and lament!” - and the essence of those four lines is felt throughout the rest of the film as well. It’s a poem that expresses the need to love while you can love, because it may not last forever, and whilst that is effectively captured in ‘Close’, the film doesn’t spend enough time exploring the relationship between its characters to truly understand the bond that they share. Franz (played by Marco Fausto Daidone) is all alone in an unfamiliar city as he prepares for a piano competition. Alone in his hotel room he cannot get through to his mother on the phone and is left overwhelmed by his own solitude. All that changes when Andrea (played by Gianluca Meotti) bursts in looking for shelter from the police. Andrea is clearly a dangerous fugitive and angrily remonstrates on the phone to his accomplice but this doesn’t perturb Franz, and very quickly the two strike up something of a friendship. Emphasis must be put on how quickly this happens. One moment Andrea is yelling on the phone, the next he and Franz are sat at the piano playing together with a closeness and sensuality between them. It’s as though a chunk of the film were taken out between the two scenes and we are supposed to just believe that they struck up a friendship just like that. There’s connective tissue between the events and this is a pattern that continues throughout the film. It’s a fault in the screenplay by Lorenzo Sicuranza and Francesco Teselli as they fail to effectively set up any of the events of the film. You sense that had the film been perhaps longer and more able to bridge the gaps between scenes then it would have been a far more moving rumination on loneliness and the human need for closeness and relationships. As it is, Lorenzo Sicuranza’s impeccably beautiful directing is let down by the gaps in the screenplay and the film feels rather unfulfilling. ‘Close’ is a disappointing film. It’s one that is full of unfulfilled potential as it fails to properly explore the depths of its questions and themes, and instead feels rushed and incomplete. VIEW REVIEW Largo It’s an astonishing turn of events that Largo, a story funded by the refugee council about a Syrian child’s mission to set sail to find his parents, would be released in the weeks following the stunning collapse of the monstrous Assad regime that was cause of so many risking their lives to flee. The hostility many have faced in safe nations is a source of shame – and Max Burgoyne-Moore and Salvatore Scarpa’s short is required watching for those in need of an empathy transplant. Musa (Zack Elsokari) lives on the coast with sponsor guardian Grace (Tamsin Greig). Having fled the civil war in his native Syria, he awaits the arrival of his parents who have promised to join him – despite the dangerous naval journey they must take. Facing discrimination from locals, Grace does what she can to comfort Musa. But a betrayal triggers the young boy into taking a fateful decision, and using an old boat he has rigged up, he sets sail to find his family. Largo is a film that leaves a lasting, moving impression. Beautiful and heartbreaking, it asks real questions of its audience – asking how we would react in unfathomable circumstances. The British coastal town that acts as its setting is a purgatory for Musa – a holding cell for him to await a family that viewers sense will never come. It’s a hard enough circumstance – but as it slowly emerges that trust is hard to come by, Musa feels left with no choice but to take his life back into his hands. It turns a mirror on us as a community and a society, and asks whether we are willing to allow the real Musas across the world to come to the same conclusions. Youngster Zack Elsokari is remarkable in the lead role. A portrayal of childhood trauma has rarely felt so authentic – particularly in his anger in place of expressiveness. Musa displays great innovation, investigation and intelligence, but still struggles to truly understand the world or come to terms with the most likely outcome of his search. His innocence has persevered despite everything that has happened to him, a secret message of hope buried deep in a desperately sad narrative. Tamsin Greig is on typically strong form as Grace, Musa’s guardian who struggles to find the right spot between disciplinarian and caregiver. The film’s moving finale is set in motion by the actions of children – a group of youngsters whose curiosity around Musa’s life has not yet been set to hatred by their surroundings. It is they who raise the alarm, that triggers the best kind of community response. A town that figuratively pushes Musa away now rallies to pull him back – with the message that isolation and discrimination have tragic ends. Few films capture the complexity of the child refugee experience better than Largo. At a moment in history when the springs of hope are emerging in Syria, we as individuals are still ultimately powerless to shape the events that lead to crisis. Largo inspires one to change what they can control – their behaviour and empathy towards those in our own communities. It is a riveting and moving short, that will never not be timely. VIEW REVIEW The Castle of Baron Finch A short horror film written and directed by Don Cunningham and starring himself alongside Jay Pennington, Elisabeth Anne Steigelman and Brad White. The year is 1863 and Dr. Christopher Cushing (Cunningham) has travelled from England to Germany in order to rescue his wife Isobel (Steigelman), who has been abducted by Baron Janos Finch (Pennington), a vampire. Chistopher must find them, do battle with the monster and save his beloved spouse. Filmed over a period of six years in Menard, Texas, this short is clearly meant to pay tribute to the horror films of the silent era. Filming was executed in black-and-white with the image looking grainy. There is no speech, no diegetic sound at all actually and the dialogue is presented through sentences on title cards just like the old days. What is heard is the gothic music Andreu Jacob that plays throughout and creates a sinister and dramatic atmosphere. Looking at the mise-en-scene, the action takes place in the countryside and there are locations that are often associated with vampire stories such as a cemetery, a castle and it should be mentioned that there is also a coffin. As for the narrative, it pretty much alternates between Christopher trying to locate his wife and Finch spending time with Isobel, teaching her how to be a vampire. Eventually, things lead to desperate life-and-death situations. It is also worth mentioning that another famous horror film creature makes its appearance. The following is not intended to bring the film down, however, fans of the vampire genre might be disappointed by a couple of things. Firstly, there are no fangs to be seen (Finch never reveals his) and secondly, Finch appears to be walking around in broad daylight and vampires are supposed to be creatures of the night, yes, the image is black-and-white, however, the sky looks like it is daytime. Again, these two observations are not ment to damage this short but they go against the conventions that are associated with vampire films. Regarding the performances, arguably Pennington is the one who stands out, portraying a vampire. Dressed in black, with long hair and a beard, he is constantly grinning, with an evil look on his face, making it clear that he is bad. Steigelman plays his victim. Wearing a white dress, looking like a bride, she appears to be under the influence of some kind of spell as she walks alongside Finch, smiling. And then there is Cunningham, who impersonates Dr. Cushing (an obvious homage to actor Peter Wilton Cushing), a brave man, determined to get his wife back. Going to the themes now, this is a story about desperation, rescue, revenge, cruelty and tragedy. A story about Good vs Evil. This is probably not meant to be a modern horror film, but rather a tribute to Gothic Horror Silent Films. Fans of the horror genre will most likely appreciate this twenty-minute long dark story that brings the viewer back in time, showing them what horror films used to be like. VIEW REVIEW I Could Dom A woman is shut down by her friends when she posits the idea that she could absolutely be a dom, so she sets out to prove them wrong. Men really can be dumb, witless freaks, can’t they? It seems that angry, bucktoothed, sex-pest, Andrew Tate may have been right about them – and let’s be clear, if he is right about this it’s the one and only thing he’s ever been remotely in the ballpark of being right about – that men are far too interested in being led about by the idea of making their pee-pee tingle. (His words, not mine.) The mere existence of the fact that Findom is a real thing, that’s financial domination to the uninitiated, is testament to this, along with OnlyFans model Sophie Rain, who seemingly racked up $43 million in earnings in the past year, with her top supporter apparently funding $4.7 million of that himself. These simps are everywhere and are becoming ever more prevalent in a post-lockdown society, where it’s easier to stay alone in your bedroom and pretend that you’re in a relationship with someone who’s only ripping you for every last cent, rather than actually go outside and have real life interactions with people. So, in the spirit of the modern generation, rather than actually going out and having sex, they’re deciding to make films about it instead. Writer, director and star, Madison Hatfield has decided to shine a light on the subject of domination in sex-play, even though she is a self-confessed novice herself. Her character, June is a lot like her – a people pleaser who always thinks of others first before setting about getting what she wants. With I Could Dom , Hatfield has decided to explore the side of herself which could be let out if the right situation arose, and so we watch as June bumbles about in some tight leather trying to take control and take what she wants when she gets a date with Jeff (Evans). This encounter is set-up by a Sex and the City style ‘ladies that lunch’ meeting between June and her two friends, Marigold (Alline) and Deb (Thomas). The other two are well versed in their respective sexual roles, with Deb extorting some poor sap who can’t stop touching himself, and Marigold sharing how she likes to be choked and slapped in the bedroom. Poor June though, is lost in amongst the conversation and when she tentatively suggests that she could dom, literally the whole room looks at her to tell her she’s wrong. Nevertheless, June gets onto the SneakyLynx app to set herself up as a dominatrix so that she can get out there and explore her new found confidence. As with most dating apps, even the non-overtly sexual ones, Jeff is a needle in a haystack as the only sane, sensible guy out there who has a decent, unthreatening tone and a relatable profile. However, Jeff definitely wants to sub and when faced with the buxom, curvaceous, leather-clad figure of June, he begins to think that all of his Christmases have come at once. Unfortunately for Jeff, June is in over her head and she can’t stop being polite, trying to make sure he is comfortable, and using the word ‘sorry’ way too much. Jeff does his best to put June at ease and is remarkably understanding in the face of such a poor dominatrix, but when he feels that June might not be getting anything out of this, he pulls out the safe-word and calls a halt to proceedings before any jiggery-pokery can begin. This causes June to have a bit of an existential crisis and she begins comparing herself to a soapdish – which does actually make sense within the narrative. Throughout I Could Dom there’s a cheeky, raunchy, titillating humour which aims to lead the vanillas amongst us delicately through the world of sex-play. The colour and lighting coming through Cristian Bernal’s cinematography also keeps things nice and soft as the sexy times heat up and almost immediately cool down, leaving the viewer feeling safe and content at all times as the very personal issues of finding ourselves through ourselves and each other get explored. The main message of loving yourself comes through nice and clear, especially in the closing moments, and the casual reminder that we’re all just a little bit freaky inside, with the need for us to be okay with that, also hits a nice comfortable note. Hatfield’s script and narrative have a nice measure of spicy fun to them and her performance as June stands out as a beautiful piece of comedy. There are nice allusions to art and mythology peppered throughout the fifteen-minute runtime, helping us to understand that people have been building fantasies around sex for a very long time, and there is room in the scenario for something bigger to be developed around this idea. Unfortunately though, the fact that I Could Dom lacks bite in its telling, is what lets it down. With Jeff being the first and only guy that June meets in this bearpit of sexual gratification, and that everything works out for the best immediately, just isn’t indicative of the real life scene. Nowhere do the letters S&M or BDSM get mentioned, showing just how tame the humour and the scenario really are in handling the downright dirty sex acts usually involved in the ritual humiliation of others for sexual gain, and overall I Could Dom feels like it’s pulling on a costume and pretending to be something it’s not. Definitely tastes more like vanilla than hot, sweaty PVC and ground metal. VIEW REVIEW The 21 *A warning to readers that the following review contains discussion of serious subject-matter. The 21 is a new animated short which depicts some viscerally disturbing real-world events. It’s an artistic retelling (and recontextualization) of the execution of 21 men committed by ISIS in a 2015 video. It goes without saying that it’s the most horrific event for a piece of art or media to be based around. On the film’s website, they intelligently talk about how they wished to “highlight[...] the courage and unshakeable faith of the martyred men, proving that gentle faith is stronger than religious fear-mongering.” So, what we get is a piece made to pay tribute to the brave men who were murdered out of hate as a result of their faith. The topics in discussion, whilst unbearably upsetting, are displayed with enough of a cinematic sense of drama, and guidance through the use of narration, that we’re able to stomach the viewing experience. And yet, most importantly, the film still doesn’t shy away from showing genuine human evil in all its ugliness. It’s very powerful work. Starting with the unique look, the film’s animation style is simply spectacular. This piece has been described by its makers as being comprised of “Neo-Coptic Iconography” as a way of paying respect to the Coptic faith, which is a fascinating school of aesthetics to adhere to – particularly in relation to animation. This would suggest that the artists – of which there were many (almost a hundred) involved in this production across multiple countries – wished to adopt a vibrant, expressionistic approach to presenting real-life events; guided, stylistically and dramatically, by the spiritual. To tell this deeply serious narrative, a two-dimensional form of animation is implemented, characterised by block colours, intense imagery, and often abstract storytelling. Audiences will find themselves in awe of the technical prowess on display. Through its textures and crafting of light, one cannot ignore the level of passion and detail being showcased on-screen. In addition to the stunning visuals, other filmic techniques are also used to further immerse viewers in the absolute terror of what’s being depicted in the film. Specifically, sound, colour, and editing were by no means overlooked during the piece’s construction. The manner in which the movie cuts imagery together – considering clearly each shot’s impact, shape, composition and feeling – to then complement or juxtapose one another, is precisely what editing is all about. Many working in the animation industry have stated how one has to effectively edit the picture simultaneously to “shooting” the picture, meaning that no excess of animated imagery would be produced due to rigorous storyboarding. You could view this as a limitation, but in the case of The 21 , it only seems to have enhanced its creative capabilities. To surmise, this is incredibly brave and phenomenally inventive filmmaking. The extensive team of animators, filmmakers and researchers who worked on this piece should be proud of their work. It is to get recognition both as a collaborative piece of visual art and as a social document of sorts. As informative as it is tragic, The 21 is a phenomenal piece of design, and an undeniably admirable tribute. VIEW REVIEW Motel Room In the movies, it is very rare that anything good happens in a motel room. Barring the conception of John Connor in ‘The Terminator’, you’ve got criminals - ‘From Dusk Till Dawn’, weirdness - William Friedkin’s ‘Bug’, and of course, most famously psychopaths - The Bates Motel in ‘Psycho’. Therefore, you’d be forgiven for walking into ‘Motel Room’ with trepidation, fearing an onslaught of horror or debauchery, but what you actually get is something extremely earnest and heartwarming. The film follows the friendship that develops between a young Armenian teenage boy, Sevag (played by Sebastian Rosero) and the prostitute, Megan (played by Tammy Kaitz) that the boy’s father hires to take his virginity. His father, Massis (played by David Gianopoulos) is a hyper-masculine figure, one whom has plenty of experience with Megan - even requesting the Massis special for his son as he kisses her and hands him over. He doesn’t understand his son, nor does his son understand him. To his father, a boy losing virginity at the age of fifteen is normal, however, for Sevag it is the last thing he wants to indulge in, not least because of his repressed homosexuality. It’s established smartly in the film’s opening that the film takes place in the midst of the AIDs crisis, on the night of Freddie Mercury’s death no less. For a while these fears are left to simmer in the background, but they never go away, and has its undertones in every line, for which credit must be given to writer Sahag Gureghian. When it does come back to the fore it potent and sensitively handled, serving only to amplify Sevag’s fears of both sex and coming out to his father - who thinks AIDs only affects gay people, whom he says have to die. All this is revealed tenderly to Megan, herself a fully fleshed out character. There’s regret in what she does, but you sense that in talking to Sevag - rather than forcing the poor boy into something he doesn’t want to do - there’s some redemption or relief that she has taken that path in life. She helps him, of course, that is what the film is ostensibly about, but under the surface, he helps her too. Such tenderness is reflected in the directing by Bradford Lipson, whose use of soft lighting only adds to the warmth and genuine care with which Megan handles Sevag. Each shot is well directed and at no point does the pace lag, it is an altogether well made film from a filmmaker with a bright future. Furthermore, Lipson brings the most out of Sebastian Rosero and Tammy Kaitz, who each give dynamic, vulnerable performances, and bounce off each other well. ‘Motel Room’ is a beautifully, tragic film in many ways. It is one that remains important even though we’ve moved on from the times that it depicts, and that in itself is tragic, but it is beautiful because it contains such warmth and ultimately hope for a better, more understanding world. VIEW REVIEW The Emerald Wasp “All things bright and beautiful as they say” runs contrary to both The Emerald Wasp’s sickly visual language and its sinister message, for this short film is anything but. The liturgy in the idiomatic phrase serves only as a sardonic overture to a film that repudiates such pastoral optimism in favour of a more grim natural order. Peter Renzullo crafts a seven-minute narrative steeped in unease, where nature's most grotesque manipulations draw reflections to the darker aspects of human relationships. For a seven-minute chatty little chamber piece, one that refreshingly disregards expository information that would find the script operating outside the present conversation, The Emerald Wasp could be considered airy if not for the crushing weight its central analogy imposes. The film opens in the same confines it finds its conclusion. A single room, one table, two people on either end. Khan (Jay Jay Jegathesan), a discernible demoniac who shares the tale of the emerald wasp and Isabella (Mirae Jang), who principally listens with an odd subservience. The Emerald Wasp marks the growing tension between the two, leveraging the chilling biology of its titular insect — a creature that subdues its prey with methodical cruelty — as both a literal and symbolic framework, reducing the abstraction inherent in themes of control, parasitism, and the fragility of autonomy down to singular universal instincts stipulated by the laws of nature. Essentially it’s eat or be eaten, you’re either in control or you’re not. The short film’s visual language, marked by a veneer of jaundiced greens and decaying hues, forgoes any striking colour contrasting or traditional beauty, replacing it with a visual malaise that mirrors the wasp’s morbid elegance. Without the tax that depth of surroundings or colour demand, the film’s flat overlay fatigues the eyes, lulling you into a kind of semi-consciousness, solely hooked on the rhythmic cadence found in the monologue of a madman. Renzullo isn’t worried about the calibre of acting on screen and it shows — he shoots with a suffocating intimacy bringing us face-to-face with Khan. Interestingly, it’s not until the film’s final moments that Renzullo pans the camera around for us to see Isabella, revealing what we could have guessed mere seconds in, that she’s sitting across the table from the mad philosopher against her will, tied to the chair. At this point we don’t know what’s worse: having to endure the torture she’ll inevitably succumb to or listen to her oppressor drone on about his deranged beliefs any longer. As the incessant sounds of clock ticks propel The Emerald Wasp to its logical conclusion, we realise it is less a conventional short film and more a condensed thesis on the ubiquitous grammar felt in every intersection of life that dictates control. This is not a film that aims to shock; rather, it seeks to unsettle, to burrow under the skin and linger like the phantom sting of its namesake. VIEW REVIEW
Blog Posts (5076)
- The Curious Clever and Collectively Convoluted Case of Detective Ebeneezer Maisonette Short Film Review
★★★★ Starring: #JacobRenouf, #EvanEmanuel, #RachelScott, #JamieMarsh, #MattDavis Directed by: #JamieMarsh Short Film Review by: Alexandra James A short film following eccentric detective Ebeneezer Maisonette and his associate Percival Farley. A new case has fallen on their lap and its up to them to recover a stolen ruby and save the day. Unfortunately, they are not your typical detectives and some of their ways can be considered a little unusual to say the least. As the case progresses, things are not all as they seem and with twists and turns thrown into the mix, it made our genius detective question everything. Ebeneezer Maisonette is not your conventional detective, he has no filter and a fascinating style, from the crazy moustache to the magnified glasses, however, despite his unusual presence, he has a passion for solving crime and a keen eye for detail. This is a similar attribute to this short film, the details included from the costumes to the locations. It can be difficult with a small budget to be able find a location suitable, especially when filming a period film. This is set around the early 1900’s, so it can be tough to scout spaces and areas that are able to reflect this timeframe, considering this is a low budget film, it was great to see how they worked around this barrier and made it work, using areas with cobbled streets or cathedrals and old churches to set the scene. Each character is witty, interesting and adds a certain flare to the story. Although the central story is around a crime, the story itself is funny and light-hearted. Director Jamie Marsh has created a good balance between comedic scenes but also clever and humorous dialogue. A way to improve this further would be the editing, there were some scenes that did not have a smooth transition compared to others, however, a majority was good quality and included some great artistic techniques and Marsh was able to add his own stamp and style to this film. An incredibly entertaining short film with great comical characters, it would be great to see other episodes of this and discover new adventures for Ebeneezer Maisonette and his associate to go on, as well to really explore the characters and establish a Marsh’s style of filmmaking.
- Hardwicke Circus: The Prison Gig Short Film Review
★★★★ Starring: #InmatesofStanfordHillHMP and #HardwickeCircus Directed by: #BenArcher Short Film Review by: Alexandra James This short documentary follows a small band from the north of England, on a mission to spread music and passion to prisoners across the UK. Director Ben Archer focuses on the bands message that all of us deserve to have access to the arts world. Music can enlighten and allow people the opportunity to express themselves in an artistic way, it can be difficult to share your inner deepest thoughts and fears, but with music there is a platform that allows people to have a voice and turn it into something positive where others can connect as well as take solace in the fact that they are not alone. Lead singer of Hardwicke Circus, Jonny Foster, creates a music workshop at Stanford Hill HMP, a men’s prison on the Isle of Sheppey. Ben Archer captures the band interacting with the inmates and the uplifting jam session that inspire and encourage many. This was a very moving film that highlights the importance of giving back to the community, and the necessity of art. People may debate as to whether prisoners should be deserving of live bands performing for them or being able to play and share their talents to others. However, there are so many benefits to this and with this documentary, it shows how powerful music can be and allows the inmates to express themselves, channel their emotions and look to the future. The documentary shows singer Jonny Foster share his thoughts over the whole concept, he states that inmates have discussed with him how to get into the music industry and about life on the road. It shows that there is something else to focus on and strive towards. Hardwicke Circus: The Prison Gig showed great moments of the band playing and bringing on inmates on stage to showcase their talent. Many of the inmates were able to just forget where they were for a moment and just be a part of something bigger and enjoy a break from the mundane routine. Ben Archer uses the ‘gonzo’ style of filmmaking which is in some of his other pieces of work. It’s a type of fly-on-the-wall documentary. It makes for a very raw film and shows the audience the connection and positivity between the band and inmates. Ben Archer has been able to feature the good work Hardwicke Circus have been able to achieve by spreading their love of music to others who may not have envisioned this as an option outside of prison.
- Through the Stew Short Film Review
★★★ Starring: #WillowBarrett, #SydWalsh and #ChuckBones Directed by: #BenArcher and #SalRedpath Short Film Review by: Alexandra James Directed by Ben Archer and Sal Redpath, Through the Stew, follows Anton a young punk whose attitude is subdued, and who clearly has no strong desires in life. Anton moves aimlessly through the streets of New York city knowing that this is his last day alive in the chaos. With just a packet of cigarettes and an old radio, Anton attempts to settle some of his affairs before he departs forever. This film uses super 8 footage and is black and white throughout, this can be seen as an extremely difficult and challenging way to capture a story. However, it also created a gritty edge to this film and provided the audience with a new perspective on the city of New York as well as the character Anton himself. Through the Stew shows Anton as extremely detached from the world, completely ignoring his surroundings and the electricity emanating from the city. He was very much aloof and the only way in which the audience could connect or get a sense of his emotions was through this 50’s style radio that he carried around with him that seemed to be sending out messages occasionally. Through the Stew is a dark and mysterious film and draws a lot of inspiration from No wave cinema and guerilla filmmaking. However, Archer and Redpath have shaped this type of cinematography into their own by weaving the theme of punk rock through the characters and their fashion choices. There appears to be an ageless feel as well, it’s one that cannot be placed in a specific timeframe, with the combination of super 8 footage, a 50s radio with noir recordings as well as elements of punk rock style, this makes it captivating as the piece is layered with a mix of a variety of eras and is perfectly unique in its own right. Ben Archer and Sal Redpath’s , Through the Stew, is an intense and edgy film that draws in aspects that connect with the punk rock era. The punk rock ethos being freedom, non-conforming and anti-establishment. A lot of the aesthetics are reflected in this film, with its underground and minimalist style and the promotion of individual freedom. An incredibly intriguing film with an original spin on No wave cinema and the backdrop of a hectic New York city as a distant, lonely man leaves it all behind.
Forum Posts (804)
- “YOUR MOVE” - REVIEW: Over the Edge, Into the DarknessIn Film Reviews·January 27, 2018There is an apocryphal saying - variously attributed to Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Mark Twain and a host of others - that there are only two stories we tell each other in our literature, our movies, our narrative arts. In the first, a person goes on a journey; in the second, a stranger comes to town. What matters is not which of these stories an artist chooses, but how it’s told, and how it illuminates another corner of the human soul, be it dark or light. With “Your Move” actor/director/writer Luke Goss effectively combines the two in the person of his protagonist, who must go on a journey to save what he loves most in the world, becoming a stranger in the dark underworld of a Mexican town where clues and danger are virtually indistinguishable. Goss - up to now known as an actor’s actor and platinum-selling musician - proves highly adept at this newest iteration of his abilities, guiding what in other hands might be a standard genre story forward with skill and subtlety. By keeping the focus on the inner workings of his characters Goss creates as much nerve-wracking tension with a quiet tableau between two people as he does with an all-out chase scene. Goss plays New York businessman David Miller, a man with a good life and a family he adores. While on a video call with his wife Isabel (Patricia De Leon) and young daughter Savannah (Laura Martin), who are in Mexico visiting Isabel’s parents, David - back home in New York - witnesses a brutal attack on them that ends in an apparent kidnapping. Stuck thousands of miles away and not knowing where to turn, David calls the local NYPD, whose skeptical response only makes him realize how dire his family’s situation actually is. As an actor Goss is deeply likable, exceptionally effective at translating what his characters are feeling, and the terror David experiences at not knowing what has happened to his loved ones is brutal and palpable. In Mexico he meets the cop in charge of the case, Detective Romero (the superb Robert Davi, in a richly nuanced performance). David wants answers, action, anything to make him feel that progress is being made. Romero, a good detective, understands the need to build his case on facts, and while Romero feels for David’s plight, the man is also his worst nightmare - an uncontrolled wild card who could blow the case at a moment’s notice by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Romero’s careful, low-key approach to the investigation seems like dangerous and deadly plodding from David’s point of view, sure to get his wife and daughter killed. On the other side of the coin is Isabel’s father, Señor Barrabas, a wealthy patrón of weight and gravity. Luis Gatica plays Barrabas with a quiet intensity that is at once civilized and menacing. Though he treats David and the detective as equals, he appears to engender fear and respect everywhere else. Accompanied at all times by a suited, hulking - and likely armed - bodyguard, who Goss subtley keeps just at the edge of the frame, Barrabas’ business dealings can only be guessed at. When it appears that he agrees with Romero’s method of handling the case, David panicks and takes matters into his own hands. Though fit and athletic, David has no “special set of skills” with which to make the bad guy’s life hell a’la the uber-hero in “Taken”, relying instead on instinct and sheer persistence, driven by the certain terror that if he doesn’t use every means at his disposal to track his family down, he will never see them again. Agonizing every step of the way over what he must become to get the job done, he isolates himself from both family and the authorities and relies instead on his gut. Goss’s abilities as a visual stylist and storyteller are well-matched to his subject matter and the camerawork is assured, but he doesn’t sacrifice character development for the sake of style. Goss - who also wrote the script - keeps the dialogue spare and measured, making wonderful use of the players’ inner lives to push the narrative and generate emotion. The acting is uniformly superb and the casting and directing are spot-on, with a touching and almost Fellini-esque sensibility, making scenes with even the most secondary characters satisfying and rewarding. The landscape of the human face as a map of the psyche clearly fascinates Goss at the deepest levels, and his painterly use of color, light and shadow add to the suspense and the unfolding story, while allowing the audience their own visual and emotional journey. And though the church is never explicitly mentioned there is a strain of lush religious iconography running through the film, implying religion as a particularly horrifying form of self-justification for the antagonist, played by Alain Mora in a performance that is a revelatory and disturbing portrayal of a man with a terrifying split in his psyche. The film may be billed as a psychological thriller, but the execution and performances defy simple genre categorization. It would appear that “Your Move” marks the auspicious start of yet another successful branch of Goss’s multi-hyphenate career. “Your Move” has its UK premiere on January 27, 2017. Watch the trailer, here: Writer: Kely Lyons - Los Angeles - January 27, 2018361950
- "Crazy Right" movie trailerIn Movie Trailers·March 5, 201824182
- Beauty and the Beast (2017) ReviewIn Film Reviews·November 1, 2017Disney is back with another live-action adaptation of one of their animated films. This time it was up to Beauty and the Beast to be remade and please the audience. But if we look at the final product that the film is, it seems to be that Disney did it more for the money than for the audience. Will the audience end up roaring for the new film or will it just be Disney happily roaring their victory over their audience? I think we all know the answer to that question. Beauty and the Beast is directed by Bill Condon and tells the tale of Belle. Belle (Emma Watson) is a young adult, who loves to read books and dreaming of playing a part in the adventures that are depicted on those pages. But when she leaves her small village to find her missing father (Kevin Kline), she encounters a large castle in which lives a horrifying Beast (Dan Stevens). As Belle stays with the Beast, she learns that true beauty is found within. Right from the beginning, the film wants to make very clear what kind of a jerk the Beast was before he came a Beast. Just like in the original animated film, where they spend a short monologue on the case. However, in this live-action adaptation they take more then a few minutes to make it clear that the Beast is a jerk. The problem is not that it is not well done, because making the Beast look arrogant is something the movie does is quite well, but the problem is that right from the beginning one of our main characters is an unlikeable prick, which creates a situation wherein you cannot root for the Beast to become normal again. You want him to stay a Beast, because that’s what he honestly deserves to be. He acts like a Beast for the first two acts of the movie. Then the filmmakers remembered that the Beast also must become a human at the end, so they quickly shoved moments in the movie trying to make the Beast look less like a prick and more like an misunderstood young adult. In the original animated film, the Beast had a compelling arc. In this film he does have an arc, but it’s not compelling because the Beast is arrogant throughout most of the film and acts like a prick to everyone around him. The arc is also rushed to the point that it makes you care even less for the Beast. Do you want examples of how much of a prick the Beast is? Well, the Beast doesn’t even give Belle a minute to say goodbye to her father, the Beast keeps correcting and interrupting Belle, the Beast wouldn’t give Belle a room, the Beast forces Belle to eat with him and lets her starve when she says she won’t eat with him etc. The thing with this movie is that they like to exaggerate everything the original did, to the point that this movie feels more like a dark cartoon then the original did.The scriptwriters Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos also try to add new story elements to the script. There is a new back-story how both Belle and the Beast lost their mothers and it adds nothing new to the story. The scriptwriters probably did this trying to make the Beast, after first writing him as such an unlikable character, look more sympathetic and to give Belle an arc. Only thing is that the new back-story doesn’t make Beast look more sympathetic, he still comes across, as a bitter young adult and Belle never gets a conclusion to her arc. Her mother died when she was just a baby. Belle never knew her mother and this has had a great impact on her. However when she finally finds out, what happened to her mother, the subplot is quickly moved aside to continue the main story. Her arc is never resolved or even started to be honest. It just a waste of time. The script also tries to give Belle more personality. They did this by making her amazing in everything. She is good in reading, good with children, good in teaching, good in inventing, good in drawing, good in taming wild beasts (get it?). However, as expected, being good in everything doesn’t count as a trademark for a character. She isn’t Leonardo Da Vinci. Belle is a dreamer, who gets inspired by the books she reads. Belle is intellectual. Indeed. But in this movie they exaggerated her intelligence to the point that this Belle feels more like a cartoon character then her animated counterpart. There are also some continuity errors. Belle on Phillipe, the horse, move like the Flash when needed. Belle just arrives shortly after the villagers arrive at the castle, while the villagers had a big head start. The sound effects are also sometimes off in the final battle. Oh right, forgot. To please the immature and the children, the movie also includes butt and poop jokes. Yeah! There is also a mystery subplot for the character Agathe, which turns out to be the witch that cursed the Beast. This is so poorly done and unnecessary. She just comes and goes when the story needs her to come an go. And her importance to the story is never explained. Which leaves another unsolved subplot.The CGI in this film is, in contrary to the beautiful The Jungle Book, more creepy than fantasy provoking. Nobody wants to see a CGI teapot smiling. They created some nice nightmare related visuals for the younger kids. Can’t wait to see this on a childhood trauma list.Not everything is bad though. The acting is on point. Especially Gaston is likeable, which feels weird because he’s supposed to be villain of the film. Well don’t worry, because for this first half of the film Gaston comes across as a normal, somewhat dimwitted, individual, but in the second half, he leaves Maurice for the wolves stuck at a tree. Something the animated Gaston would probably also be able to do. The Gaston song is also very amusing. Their is actually an illiterate joke in their that works. The song also contains one exciting, maybe little expectable, but still amusing shot. In the end, Beauty and the Beast, is another Disney remake that is poorly executed and is solely done for the money. This movie in particular felt more like a cash grab than the other Disney movies. That is probably because the effect of the original is still untouched by other Disney movies. It is the only animated movie to be nominated for best picture. It is one of the most well known Disney movies. These were the reasons for which Disney thought that their live-action version could earn some big money. Sadly, it did. Overall, it’s not a complete failure. There are some genuine emotional moments. Some new interesting ideas, that all don’t workout however. And sometimes a joke works. But in the end, the movie is still pretty bad, mostly thanks to the poor script.15166